"Fair" is the most overused and under-defined word in equity conversations. Every founder believes their proposed split is fair. The problem is that different people are using completely different definitions — one based on contribution, one based on role, one based on the idea, one based on time invested before founding. Getting alignment on the definition is the first and hardest step.
Try our free equity split calculatorEverything corporate in one place — no spreadsheets.
Set up your company's cap table in minutes.
Everything corporate in one place — no spreadsheets.
Set up your company's cap table in minutes.
Contribution-based fairness says whoever puts in more — time, money, expertise, risk — gets more equity. Role-based fairness says the CEO should get more than the CTO because the CEO role is worth more to the company. Both definitions have merit but often conflict. A CTO who built the entire product before revenue is worth more than a CEO who joined later — at least at that moment. Equity structures that combine fixed allocations for role value with dynamic tracking for ongoing contribution can honor both perspectives.
| Contribution-based fairness | Role-based fairness | |
|---|---|---|
| The principle | Whoever puts in more — time, money, expertise, risk — gets more | The role worth more to the company gets more |
| The typical argument | The CTO who built the product before revenue is worth more right now | The CEO role carries more value than the CTO role |
| How to honor it | Dynamic tracking of ongoing contribution | A fixed allocation for role value |
A startup that carves out a reserved pool from day one signals that its founding team is thinking beyond themselves. A 10-20% pool held back for future employees, advisors, and early investors is standard. Teams that don't do this find themselves in the uncomfortable position of issuing equity from their personal stakes when they hire key people. Equafy treats the reserved pool as a top-level feature of the cap table, separate from the founder allocation.
Investors look for equity tables that are clean, legally documented, and unlikely to cause founder conflict. Red flags include a departed cofounder still holding a large stake with no vesting, a 50/50 split with no tie-breaking mechanism, zero reserved pool for employees, or a cap table so complex that it's unclear who actually controls the company. A fair and well-structured split is part of what makes a company investable.
Red flags investors look for
A departed cofounder still holding a large stake with no vesting; a 50/50 split with no tie-breaking mechanism; zero reserved pool for employees; or a cap table so complex it's unclear who actually controls the company.
No universal formula exists, but contribution-based models like Slicing Pie provide a mathematical framework. For fixed splits, the key variables are time commitment, capital contribution, opportunity cost, and prior contribution.
Typically 10-20% at formation. Investors may require 15-20% before a seed round. The pool should be sized to accommodate expected hires over the next 12-18 months.
Yes. A verbal agreement is worth nothing in a dispute. The equity split should be documented in a shareholder agreement, signed by all parties, and reflected in the corporate share register.
Equafy gives your team a transparent, auditable cap table with fixed equity, dynamic contributions, and a built-in reserved pool — fair by design.
Get Started Free